What does Son of Man mean?
The title “Son of Man” is one of the most significant and multifaceted descriptions of Jesus found in the Gospels. Far from being a simple statement of his humanity, it's a rich theological term with roots in the Old Testament, particularly the prophet Daniel. Jesus frequently used this title to refer to himself, highlighting aspects of his earthly ministry, his suffering, his authority, and his future glorious return. Understanding “Son of Man” unlocks deeper insights into Jesus' self-perception and his unique role in God's plan of salvation.
"Son of Man" is Jesus's favored self-designation, integrating Old Testament prophecy with his human experience, suffering, authority, and future glory.
The Old Testament Roots: Daniel's Vision
The primary Old Testament source for the “Son of Man” title is found in the book of Daniel. In a profound vision, Daniel sees "one like a son of man coming with the clouds of heaven" (Daniel 7:13). This figure approaches the Ancient of Days (God) and is given "dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one which shall not be destroyed" (Daniel 7:14).
This prophecy is crucial for several reasons. First, it presents a divine or semi-divine figure distinct from God, yet intimately associated with God's ultimate reign. Second, it emphasizes universal and eternal dominion, far surpassing any earthly king. Third, the imagery of "clouds of heaven" often signifies divine presence and judgment throughout Scripture. For Jewish readers in Jesus' day, this vision would have strongly shaped expectations of a powerful, messianic deliverer.
Jesus's Self-Designation and Its Nuances
Jesus uses the title "Son of Man" more than 80 times in the Gospels, making it his most frequent self-designation. This is striking because he rarely explicitly calls himself "Messiah" or "Son of God" in public, likely to avoid political misunderstandings of those titles. By contrast, "Son of Man" allowed him to define his mission on his own terms, drawing on the authority of Daniel's prophecy while also infusing it with new meaning.
Often, Jesus links the "Son of Man" title to his earthly ministry and identification with humanity. He speaks of the Son of Man having "nowhere to lay his head" (Matthew 8:20; Luke 9:58), emphasizing his humble, itinerant existence. He also connects it to his authority on earth, such as the power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10; Luke 5:24) and being "lord even of the Sabbath" (Mark 2:28).
The Suffering Son of Man
A particularly significant aspect of Jesus's use of "Son of Man" is its connection to his suffering, death, and resurrection. Repeatedly, Jesus predicts that "the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again" (Mark 8:31; see also Matthew 17:22-23; Luke 9:22). This was a revolutionary concept for many of his contemporaries, who expected a conquering messiah, not a suffering one.
Through this title, Jesus revealed that his path to glory and dominion, as prophesied in Daniel, would pass through humiliation, suffering, and death. This challenges popular notions of power and success, showing that true victory in God's kingdom is achieved through self-sacrifice and obedience to the Father's will. The suffering of the Son of Man is central to Christian theology, forming the basis for atonement and redemption.
The Glorious and Coming Son of Man
While emphasizing his humanity and suffering, Jesus also frequently used "Son of Man" to speak of his future glory, judgment, and ultimate return. He declares that "the Son of Man will come in the glory of his Father with his angels, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done" (Matthew 16:27; see also Mark 13:26; Luke 21:27). This vividly recalls Daniel's vision of the Son of Man receiving everlasting dominion.
This eschatological (end-times) aspect of the title provides a powerful hope for believers and a warning for unbelievers. It points to a future day when Jesus, the Son of Man, will return in power and majesty to judge the living and the dead, bringing God's eternal kingdom to its full consummation. The Son of Man will sit on "his glorious throne" (Matthew 25:31) as the ultimate judge.
Bible verses about son of man
"I saw in the night-visions, and, behold, there came with the clouds of heaven one like unto a son of man, and he came even to the ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations, and languages should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed."
"And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the heaven have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head."
"But that ye may know that the Son of man hath authority on earth to forgive sins (he saith to the sick of the palsy),"
"And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders, and the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again."
"For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then shall he render unto every man according to his deeds."
"But when the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the angels with him, then shall he sit on the throne of his glory:"
"And Jesus said unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the heaven have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head."
"so that the Son of man is lord even of the sabbath."
"saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and the third day be raised up."
Frequently asked
How is "Son of Man" different from "Son of God"?
While both titles refer to Jesus, "Son of Man" primarily emphasizes his humanity, his suffering, his authority on earth, and his role as a future judge, drawing heavily from Daniel 7. "Son of God," on the other hand, highlights his divine nature, his unique relationship with the Father, and his eternal pre-existence (e.g., John 1:1-18). Jesus is both fully human (Son of Man) and fully divine (Son of God), and these titles provide distinct windows into his single, complete person.
Why did Jesus use "Son of Man" so often instead of "Messiah"?
Jesus likely preferred "Son of Man" to "Messiah" because the latter carried strong political and nationalistic connotations among first-century Jews, who often expected a conquering king to free them from Roman rule. Using "Son of Man" allowed Jesus to define his messianic role according to God's redemptive plan, which included suffering and a spiritual kingdom, rather than being limited by popular, often misguided, expectations. It enabled him to subtly hint at his divine authority and future glory without immediately provoking misunderstanding or political unrest.
Does "Son of Man" only refer to Jesus?
While the title "Son of Man" is most famously and significantly applied to Jesus in the New Testament due to its profound theological meaning from Daniel 7, the phrase "son of man" (lowercase) can also simply refer to a human being in the Old Testament. For example, in Ezekiel, God frequently addresses the prophet as "son of man" (e.g., Ezekiel 2:1), emphasizing Ezekiel's humanity in contrast to God's divinity. However, when capitalized and used as a title for a specific figure with divine authority and future glory, especially by Jesus himself, it unequivocally refers to Christ.
Is the "Son of Man" connected to the "Suffering Servant" in Isaiah?
Yes, there is a strong theological connection, though the titles come from different Old Testament passages. The "Suffering Servant" prophecies in Isaiah (e.g., Isaiah 53) describe one who would suffer, be despised, and die for the sins of many. Jesus's repeated predictions of the Son of Man suffering and dying (e.g., Mark 8:31) clearly link his understanding of the Son of Man's role with the prophetic picture of the Suffering Servant. He combined the glorious, authoritative figure from Daniel with the humble, suffering figure from Isaiah, presenting a complete picture of his messianic mission.
Are there different interpretations of "Son of Man" among Christians?
While there is broad agreement on the core meaning, some scholarly discussions exist on the precise nuances. For instance, some scholars debate whether Jesus was directly referencing Daniel 7 every time he used the title, or if he was also using it in a more general sense of "human." However, the mainstream Christian understanding consistently affirms that the title, particularly in the Gospels, points to Jesus's unique identity as the promised Messiah, embodying both humanity and divine authority, destined for suffering and ultimate glory. The emphasis on his dual nature and redemptive work remains a central tenet.
Keep reading