Acts 24:19

What does Acts 24:19 mean?

A plain-English look at Acts 24:19 in WEB alongside six other public-domain English translations, with cross-references and chapter context.

What Acts 24:19 means

Paul points out that the Jews from Asia—the ones who first raised the outcry—ought to be present to accuse him if they have anything against him. This appeals to a fundamental principle of justice: accusers must face the accused. Their absence speaks loudly. If their case were strong, they would be there. By raising this, Paul exposes a procedural flaw that undermines the prosecution. Without eyewitnesses, the charges are hearsay. He is inviting Felix to uphold proper legal standards rather than bow to pressure or polished speeches.

Parallel translations

WEB

World English Bible · 2000

who ought to have been here before thee, and to make accusation, if they had aught against me.

KJV

King James Version · 1611

Who ought to have been here before thee, and object, if they had ought against me.

ASV

American Standard Version · 1901

who ought to have been here before thee, and to make accusation, if they had aught against me.

BBE

Bible in Basic English · 1949

And it would have been better if they had come here to make a statement, if they have anything against me.

YLT

Young's Literal Translation · 1862

whom it behoveth to be present before thee, and to accuse, if they had anything against me,

DRA

Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · 1752

But certain Jews of Asia, who ought to be present before thee and to accuse, if they had anything against me:

DBY

Darby Bible · 1890

who ought to appear before thee and accuse, if they have anything against me;

Context

After naming the Jews from Asia in verse 18, Paul now makes the legal implication explicit: they should be present to testify. Verse 19 thus shifts the focus to the integrity of the proceedings. In verse 20, he will challenge the current accusers to name any concrete wrongdoing discovered before the council. Then verse 21 will reveal the sole point of dispute: his proclamation about the resurrection, which recasts the trial as a theological controversy, not a civic crime.

v.18amidst which they found me purified in the temple, with no crowd, nor yet with tumult: but there were certain Jews from Asia—

v.19This passage

v.20Or else let these men themselves say what wrong-doing they found when I stood before the council,

Cross references

Related passages from across Scripture, drawn from the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge.

  • Acts 25:16

    To whom I answered, that it is not the custom of the Romans to give up any man, before that the accused have the accusers face to face, and have had opportunity to make his defence concerning the matter laid against him.

  • Acts 23:30

    And when it was shown to me that there would be a plot against the man, I sent him to thee forthwith, charging his accusers also to speak against him before thee.

Related questions readers ask